Unsupported Browser
The American College of Surgeons website is not compatible with Internet Explorer 11, IE 11. For the best experience please update your browser.
Menu
Become a member and receive career-enhancing benefits

Our top priority is providing value to members. Your Member Services team is here to ensure you maximize your ACS member benefits, participate in College activities, and engage with your ACS colleagues. It's all here.

Become a Member
Become a member and receive career-enhancing benefits

Our top priority is providing value to members. Your Member Services team is here to ensure you maximize your ACS member benefits, participate in College activities, and engage with your ACS colleagues. It's all here.

Become a Member
ACS

ACS Entering Resident Readiness Assessment (ACS ERRA)

Gain valuable insight into the decision-making skills of your entering surgery residents.

ACS Entering Resident Readiness Assessment (ACS ERRA)

ERRA's Impact

Since 2018, we have provided valuable insights for residents and program directors, including more than 173 surgical residency programs in 36 states and over 5,200 entering residents.

“ACS ERRA allows for high-level judgment assessment that then enables the program, the program director, and the intern (general surgery or those destined to end up in a surgical specialty) to work together to enhance autonomy, purposeful indirect supervision, and keep our patients safe."

Associate Dean, Assessment, Improvement, and Accreditation; ACS ERRA champion

What Is the ACS ERRA?

The Entering Resident Readiness Assessment (ERRA), developed by the ACS Division of Education, is an innovative online, case-based instrument to measure the preparedness of entering surgical residents (PGY-1).

ACS ERRA focuses on clinical decision-making for cases frequently encountered at the beginning of resident training. The assessment provides surgery program directors and residents with psychometrically rigorous measures of key decision-making skills needed to safely assume their new clinical responsibilities.

Short case scenarios are used to address essential clinical topics through special "key features" questions that specifically assess clinical decision-making skills instead of simple recall of factual knowledge. Results of the assessment can be used to identify strengths and to develop learning plans in areas that may need reinforcement for individual residents or the entering group as a whole.

Assessment Description

The ACS ERRA is a psychometrically rigorous, formative assessment of PGY-1 preparedness, focusing on 20 clinical topics that incoming surgical residents are likely to encounter. The ACS Division of Education methodically defined a validated domain of cases and recruited expert faculty to develop the assessment. Residents respond to 40 short clinical cases, each followed by questions that specifically assess key clinical decisions. As a formative tool, the ACS ERRA is intended to assess residents' decision-making at the time they enter surgical residency; it is not intended to measure factual knowledge recall or to be used as a summative assessment.

Response formats include short, write-in answers (for example, listing possible diagnoses) or the selection of options from menus containing possible next steps in the investigation or management of the problem. The specially designed questions use the internationally proven “key features” approach as established by Georges Bordage, MD, MSc, PhD, and Gordon Page, MA, EdD, in which the case scenarios require medical knowledge to be applied appropriately at critical decision points during management of the case. Key features may include essential steps required to resolve a problem, a particularly challenging aspect in the identification and management of the problem, or actions most likely associated with errors in practice. Because not all steps in the management of patient problems are equally important, assessment time is best spent by focusing exclusively on the most challenging aspects that will distinguish appropriate performance.

Assessment Logistics

The ACS ERRA is a proctored assessment, requiring a staff member to monitor the room where residents take the assessment. The administration is allowed at any time within the Administration Window, indicated above. Each resident will need their own computer with strong Internet connectivity. Ideally, residents will take the assessment in the same window, however, it is possible to split administration. Contact the ACS ERRA staff for more information.

Residents are allowed up to three hours to complete the assessment; however, the average is closer to a two-hour duration. Results will be provided by late July.

ACS staff will be happy to provide training and assistance with the technical and administrative details of the assessment.

Intended for formative assessment and evaluation

Following the assessment, program directors and residents are provided with psychometrically sound, nationally benchmarked, individualized score reports for each resident. The reports identify specific areas of strength, weaknesses that need to be addressed, areas with potentially harmful actions, and corresponding suggested resources for additional study. Designed for formative purposes, the ACS ERRA score reports outline steps for residents to identify areas for improvement, develop a personalized learning plan with the accompanying template, and meet with their program director to put their plans to action over the subsequent months.

Confidential Results

Following the assessment, program directors will receive confidential reports each providing data on the preparedness of residents in each clinical topic. Data are provided on reports for each individual resident and for the program at-large, and include aggregate national data for comparison with other participating programs nationwide.

Individual resident reports include information regarding individual scores. These reports will allow program directors and each resident to recognize specific areas of strength and to develop learning plans to address focused areas for increasing preparedness.

Program reports list the topic areas and resident levels of performance based on the percent answered correctly in each area, as well as the overall distribution of scores on the assessment. Results can help inform curricular changes for the cohort.

An Individual Learning Plan (ILP) template is included with each individual score report. The template is designed to facilitate conversations between the program director and resident to help define focused learning goals and to identify specific actions for residents to take.

Development and Authors

The ACS Division of Education methodically defined a validated domain of cases and recruited expert faculty to develop the assessment. Four pilot studies were conducted in a step-wise sequence with improvements made after each pilot. The first pilot was a small study that focused on the test takers’ understanding of the clinical cases. The second pilot study asked users to provide feedback on the assessment’s online presentation and functionality. The technical feasibility study tested the technical operations and capacity of the online server. Most importantly, the psychometric pilot study was conducted during the summer of 2017 across 18 surgical residency programs nationwide: the results demonstrated validity and psychometric rigor. (doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003241).

Development is ongoing to protect the integrity and quality of the assessment.

Leadership Team

  • Kathy R. Liscum, MD, FACS, Co-Chair
  • Ajit K. Sachdeva, MD, FACS, FRCSC, FSACME, MAMSE, Co-Chair
  • Adnan A. Alseidi, MD, EdM, FACS
  • Enjae Jung, MD, FACS
  • Edgardo Salcedo, MD, FACS
  • Yoon Soo Park, PhD
  • Patrice Gabler Blair, DrPH, MPH
  • Kevin M. Wasielewski, MPH, MBA

ACS ERRA Authors

  • Georges Bordage, MD, MSc, PhD
  • Rebecca C. Britt, MD, FACS
  • Melissa E. Brunsvold, MD, FACS
  • Benjamin W. Dart IV, MD, FACS
  • Celia M. Divino, MD, FACS
  • Robert M. Goldstein, MD, FACS
  • Enjae Jung, MD, FACS
  • Alan P. Ladd, MD, FACS
  • Jennifer LaFemina, MD, FACS
  • Eric Lazar, MD, FACS
  • John D. Mellinger, MD, FACS
  • Sarkis H. Meterissian, MD, FACS
  • Rebecca M. Minter, MD, FACS
  • John T. Mullen, MD, FACS
  • Patricia J. Numann, MD, FACS
  • Barbara J. Pettitt, MD, FACS, FAAP
  • Douglas S. Smink, MD, FACS
  • Ranjan Sudan, MD, FACS

Price

The cost of the ERRA is $150 per resident.

Enrollment Dates

March 24–May 30, 2025

Administration Dates

June 9–July 3, 2025


Complete the form below to request an ACS ERRA demonstration for program staff.


Hear From Program Directors

Learn about the value ACS ERRA provides to directors and residents.

View Testimonials

For Residents

The ACS ERRA is intended to help you and your program director gain a better sense of your strengths and areas for improvement regarding your clinical decision-making and actions.

Learn More

 


The Assessment and Score Reports

Approximately 120 questions across 40 cases

  • Two response formats
    • short, write-in answers (for example, listing possible diagnoses)
    • selection from menus (containing possible next steps in the investigation or management of the problem)
  • Individualized score reports for residents and program directors
    • Specific details on strengths and areas for improvement in the identification and management of surgical care decisions across 20 topics

FAQ

View Frequently Asked Questions to learn more about ACS ERRA.

Contact Us

For more information, e-mail acserra@facs.org or call 312-202-5127.

You may also reach program leadership by contacting Kevin Wasielewski, MPH, MBA, at kwasielewski@facs.org, or Patrice Gabler Blair, DrPH, MPH, at pblair@facs.org in the ACS Division of Education.